Warning: mysql_num_rows(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /home/worldcit/public_html/libraries/joomla/database/database/mysql.php on line 293
Warning: mysql_num_rows(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /home/worldcit/public_html/libraries/joomla/database/database/mysql.php on line 293
Warning: mysql_num_rows(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in /home/worldcit/public_html/libraries/joomla/database/database/mysql.php on line 293
| April 2013 |
Top Exports From Savannah/Wilmington
Total Exports From Savannah/Wilmington: $0| Rank | Commodity | Total YTD Exports |
|---|---|---|
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 |
Top Imports To Savannah/Wilmington
Total Imports To Savannah/Wilmington: $0| Rank | Commodity | Total YTD |
|---|---|---|
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 |
| April 2013 |
Top Savannah/Wilmington Trading Partners
Total Savannah/Wilmington trade: $0| Rank | Country | Total YTD |
|---|---|---|
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 | ||
| $0 |
Top US Trading Partners
Total U.S. trade for all countries: $1,240,094,299,613| Rank | Commodity | Total YTD Exports |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CANADA | $208,978,587,734 |
| 2 | CHINA | $167,425,009,162 |
| 3 | MEXICO | $164,532,690,124 |
| 4 | JAPAN | $67,112,714,884 |
| 5 | GERMANY | $51,552,541,119 |
| 6 | SOUTH KOREA | $34,229,534,716 |
| 7 | UNITED KINGDOM | $32,584,296,233 |
| 8 | FRANCE | $24,202,553,636 |
| 9 | BRAZIL | $21,977,714,927 |
| 10 | SAUDI ARABIA | $20,869,108,860 |
Savannah/Wilmington’s trade decreases 0.00 percent through December
Savannah/Wilmington’s trade with the world rose to $0 through the first months of , according to a WorldCity analysis of the latest U.S. Census Bureau data. That’s 0.00 percent decreases the Customs district’s total trade during the same time period last year. The district’s exports decreased 0.00 percent while imports dropped 0.00 percent.
Through December the district’s top trade partners were No. 1 , No. 2 , No. 3 , No. 4 and No. 5 . Through the first months of the last year, top five spots were held by , , , and , respectively.
Taking a closer look at the leading trade partners with Savannah/Wilmington:
- No.1 ’s trade fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
Exports fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated. Imports fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated. - No.2 ’s trade fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
Exports fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated. Imports fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated. - No.3 ’s trade fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
Exports fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated. Imports fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated. - No.4 ’s trade fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
Exports fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated. Imports fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated. - No.5 ’s trade fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
Exports fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated. Imports fell to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
Warning: Division by zero in /home/worldcit/public_html/tmp/htmlogxxrP on line 342
Savannah/Wilmington’s top five trading partners through December accounted for 0 percent of its trade with the world. The U.S. average for the same period was 53.19 percent.
Savannah/Wilmington had trade surpluses with 0 countries and deficits with 0 through December. That compares with surpluses and deficits for the same period one year earlier. The top three surpluses through December of this year were with , $0; , $0; and , $0. The top three deficits were with ($0), ($0) and ($0).
Meanwhile, total U.S. trade decreased to $1,240,094,299,613, down -0.88 percent compared to the same period last year. The nation’s exports climbed 0.32 percent to $4,038,186,093 as imports dropped -1.20 percent to $-15,017,653,007. The nation’s top five trade districts so far this year, by value, are Los Angeles, New York City, Laredo, Houston and Detroit. The overall trade deficit climbed $-214,073,880,779, down compared to the same period of last year when the deficit was $-233,129,719,879.
Savannah/Wilmington’s top five exports by value through December were ; ; ; ; and
Warning: Division by zero in /home/worldcit/public_html/tmp/htmlogxxrP on line 389
, in that order. Those accounted for 0.00 percent of its total outbound trade. The value of the district’s top five imports, ; ; ; ; and
Warning: Division by zero in /home/worldcit/public_html/tmp/htmlogxxrP on line 398
, accounted for 0.00 percent of all inbound shipments.
Looking more closely at Savannah/Wilmington exports:
- fell compared to last year to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
- fell compared to last year to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
- fell compared to last year to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
- fell compared to last year to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
- fell compared to last year to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
On the import side:
- fell compared to last year to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
- fell compared to last year to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
- fell compared to last year to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
- fell compared to last year to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
- fell compared to last year to $0. The total for the comparable period in -1 was either $0 or the data could not be found, so a percentage cannot be calculated.
Last year the Savannah/Wilmington district posted total trade with the world of $0. The district’s deficit was $0. At year end, the region’s top five partners were , , , and . Exports totaled $0 and imports came to $0.